Skip to content
SHD Sim
Menu

Pedestrian wind comfort

Pedestrian wind comfort in OpenFOAM: wind at street level around buildings

Assess wind conditions at pedestrian height around a development — the accelerations between towers, the downwash off a facade, and whether a seating area is usable.

What it is

The same atmospheric flow as a wind-loading study, read at 1.5 metres instead of across the whole facade. Buildings accelerate wind into gaps and pull it down their windward faces, and the result is judged against comfort criteria for sitting, standing and walking rather than against a pressure.

What the application sets up

  • An atmospheric boundary layer inlet with the right roughness and profile
  • A domain sized around the development with the surrounding context included
  • Meshing that resolves the gaps between buildings, where the accelerations are
  • Multiple wind directions, since one direction is not an assessment
  • Velocity sampled at pedestrian height, ready for comfort criteria

Typical uses

  • Planning submissions requiring a wind comfort assessment
  • Public realm and seating area design
  • Entrance and podium downwash problems
  • Testing whether a mitigation screen or canopy actually works

Industries

Sectors where this analysis is routinely asked for.

  • Urban planning
  • Property development
  • Architecture
  • Local authorities

What comes out

  • Pedestrian-level wind speed maps
  • Comfort classification by area
  • Problem corners and gaps identified
  • Mitigation option comparison

OpenFOAM solvers

  • simpleFoam

Selected and configured for you from the analysis type. You can still see every dictionary the application writes.

In every tier

This analysis type is in the free build. The free tier limits mesh size to 250,000 cells and solving to one core — not which physics you may use.


On accuracy, plainly.

Every analysis type is exercised end to end on every pass — its case is generated, meshed and run — which establishes that the setup is right, not that the answer matches your geometry. No CFD result is evidence until it is checked against something you trust: a measurement, a hand calculation, or a mesh-refinement study the application will run for you. Treat these results with the judgement you would apply to any CFD you set up yourself.